LCPS Underground

Las Cruces Public Schools postings concerning the current administration and issues in the district. Every effort has been made to deal in fact, not fiction. If you want to make a comment, click on comments after any post and write your comment. These may be sent anonymously. Email should be sent to lcps_truth@yahoo.com. All email will be confidential.

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Three candidate names were submitted for consideration to be Director of Secondary Instruction. Joyce Aranda was not one of them....
--
Watching the LCPS Board of Education televised meetings reminds me of watching the old black and white comedy shows in the 50's and 60's. Slap-stick at its finest!
--
Poor, disillusioned, Ms. ja... and friend, they actually believe that she can impact this district with anything other than the probationary status she has worked so hard, 7:00 a.m.- 10:00 p.m. daily, to achieve at OHS -- oh my!
--
Let's vote while the board continues to sleep! One for Ms. administrator in charge, two for the road, three to get ready' let's guess who she re-opened the HR position for? How many EEOC complaints will this one acquire! Aren't we proud, or so ashamed.
--
Oh great, now we have Joyce to join the Fema-Nazi Liz...Hold on to your jobs boys...it's going to be a bumpy ride
--
Plus a change, plus se la mem chose...(It's French) (Blogger Comment: Plus c'est la meme chose, plus ça change) Joyce Aranda? Why should you be surprised by anything that happens at central office? The year we were told there was no money available for printer supplies, tech money was spent for central office staff to take graduate level courses at the university. Result: fancy titles, fancy offices and fancy salaries at central office while we use activity money so students can print their work. I guess that is what they mean by "it's for the kids".
--
I would like to ask the indignant teacher (taunting the parent who feels like he can't trust his children's teachers or principals to appropriately discipline his children) to get off your high horse, have a little empathy and consider that he may have a history of traumatic experiences in his own education to which he is responding. Growing up in the 70's, my sweetheart of a younger brother had, due to a birth injury, severe school anxiety and learning disorders. Back then we had few of the Special Ed services we do now, and no medications or therapies for his issues, which would be an option now. While the majority of teachers/administrators over the years had a lot of compassion for him, and were genuinely caring and helpful, enough were not, and they have permanently scarred him for life. He was occasionally abused by a few morons who lacked understanding of or skills to deal with his problems. They thought he was being "spoiled" by my parents (who were struggling with early special ed programs that were failing to address his needs), or was just faking. His second grade teacher locked him in the class supply closet because he didn't finish an assignment on time, refused to let him out even though he cried and begged her, and he ended up wetting his pants. His sixth grade teacher sent him to the office for bringing shotgun shells he had found on the playground to class and looking at them while they were supposed to be doing work. To teach him a lesson, the principal had his friend, the local town cop, come in and pretend to arrest my 10 year-old brother, a kid who was distracted, dyslexic, and immature, but never a trouble maker or violent child--he had merely annoyed his teacher that day. During the "arrest", he was handcuffed, read his rights and was told that they would not be able to call our parents before taking him to jail. As a result, he experienced a full-blown panic attack that resulted in the school nurse being called in. My parents, when they learned of the event, threatened to sue the school, and the Superintendent forced the principal to apologize to my brother and my parents. My brother is 40 years old now and has made a great life for himself, but still has very traumatic associations with school that I dare say would lead to him being overly protective of his children if they were unfairly disciplined by school personnel. His experiences sensitized me to children's issues, and were part of why I entered first education, then counseling as a profession. The point of my story is this: don't assume that the parent who cares about justice for his child doesn't demand they behave well, or is protecting their child from natural consequences by advocating for their child. Yes, the teachers and administrators most of us know do a terrific job, and would never knowingly wrongly discipline a child. But there ARE those, and we all know them, that should never have entered the profession in the first place, and they deserve NONE of us covering for them. Ever.
--
My middle school is focused on learning. Though overcrowded (1100+), our student-centered educational focus never changes. Administration is overworked, but supportive (of teachers and students) and academically driven. My team and my content PLC are invaluable! We care about the students as learners and as people. I'm sure that the other middle schools have similar teams who could say the same thing! All this middle school doom & gloom is misinformation that many readers may assume to be true of all schools, all grade levels and all teachers- it is not.

8 Comments:

At 12:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I grew up during this same time frame; I even have horrow stories of public school experiences. Yet, I didn't evolve into the vidictive parent that seems to be lurking out there, because of my past. Instead, I have chosen to embrace the schools; after all, they are our future! Teachers need our support now, more than ever. They should be honored and revered for their tireless work and dedication to our children.

 
At 3:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's really sad to see people taking out their frustrations on teachers, when it's the central office people who have bogged down this district, stolen its money, and robbed the children of Las Cruces of the money that should go to give them a valuable education. The district would be in even worse shape if it wasn't for those teachers who break their backs and care deeply about the children.

I'm absolutely disgusted by the central administration of the Las Cruces Public Schools. These people are selfish, self-serving, bureaucrats, who care about nothing more than their titles and raises. As an employee of the LCPS, it's hard to go to work everyday and keep it out of my mind, the fact that the people downtown, my bosses, are the most incompetent people I've ever known. The only reason they're glad that Dr. Death (Diaz) was let go is so they can get back to the business of razing the district their own way.

 
At 4:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

My mother used to say, "Be careful what you wish for." The popular sentiment in the district was to remove Sonia Diaz. Well, now that our wish has been granted look what we've ended up with! She also said "The devil you know is better than the devil you don't." Santa won't you bring us some sanity!

 
At 7:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The good ole' girl club has been alive and well in LCPS for a long time. Take a look:
Virginia Foltz hires Joann Patton
Patricia Miller hires Marcy Oxford
Joann Patton hires Virginia Foltz
Beverly Hine hires Ellen Williams
Janaan Diemer hres Lynn Bryant
Sheryl White hires Terry Hurt
And for how many of these good ole' girl hirings were the positions even posted? Get the real picture here?

 
At 10:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How dare Liz Marrufo do just what the school board did? They asked for community input and then hired Diaz when nobody wanted her. Marrufo asks for a committee's recomendation on the Director of Secondary Education and hires someone who did not make the cut. What's the difference in the actions of these two arrogant school administrators? What kind of professional can Joyce Aranda be when she claims to be an advocate for students and teachers, then turns around and bails out of a failing school? How much more irresponsible can she be? I feel sorry for LCPS secondary schools.

 
At 10:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

All parties interested in making certain that the new superintendant process is handled carefully and appropriately should make certain that they view the options posted at Heath Haussamen's blog: http://haussamen.blogspot.com/
All three options seem to preclude interaction by new board members and the oversight committee's seem to be stacked in favor of the status quo therefore giving the interim superintendant an unfair advantage. We have made far too many hasty decisions that have created residual damage that will reach far into the future. While our out-of-town selections have been poor I'm not convinced that our interim selection isn't also flawed. I still believe the Public Education Department should take over the day-to-day activities for at least a year. Our district leadership still hasn't proved that it has the good sense to make informed decisions. The teachers have and will continue to do their jobs of educating the children. I am tired of the district leadership acting more like the children we teach than the example they should be setting.

 
At 4:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do we have another casualty of Sonia and the Board's ineffectiveness? Dorothy Anderson has left the district.

 
At 4:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Bloggmaster: I know you are probably taking some much deserved time off for the holidays but please do not give up this blog. The district is still in trouble and your willingness to allow people to air their concerns has been most beneficial. The work has only just begun, please keep up this blog!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home