LCPS Underground

Las Cruces Public Schools postings concerning the current administration and issues in the district. Every effort has been made to deal in fact, not fiction. If you want to make a comment, click on comments after any post and write your comment. These may be sent anonymously. Email should be sent to lcps_truth@yahoo.com. All email will be confidential.

Sunday, November 19, 2006

Sunday Evening

It is also very important to show up at 4:45 for the beginning of the school board meeting in order to school the board that people are watching, interested and will hold them accountable. Please show up at 4:45 and then come back at 7 pm.

--

I agree --- everyone should show up on Monday night! But be prepared for a lot longer meeting than 7:30 --- their last session lasted until 10:30pm. Make arrangements at home so that everyone can stay till the end. It's important to show this community does care about what the Board decides. We can only hope they decide to terminate!

--

I would like to add that most employees are very hard working, the teachers, the principals and the administrative team at CO. It is time to stand together. We all work to deliver the educational product from our custodians on up including the other departments like Physical Plant not housed at CO. Educated individuals realized that individual incidences of upsetness, regardless of the cause are no reason to dismiss the efforts of an entire group of people. It is the Board that has fueled this WE, THEY mentally to keep the pot stirred. As an employee, I am proud of the efforts, ethics and professionalism of the vase majority of our employees. We all deserve better than this Board of Education and Superintendent...especially for our student's sake. We must present a united voice.

--

Super Fund Clean Up“The best leaders are those who empower others to lead.” (Bill Gates) If one concurs with the words of Bill Gates, there can be no doubt that the current school board members and the last two superintendents have failed this school district. When “agendas” are made behind closed doors and in closed session, no one is empowered besides those who sit behind those doors. I have repeatedly heard Ms. Diaz make broad statements to the news media and parents, such as ˜We are working on it” or, “We’re looking at it” or, “We want to bring in the best professionals” or, “We have set up focus groups in the different schools to evaluate”. My questions are: Who is the “we” in “we are”? What is the stated purpose and agenda of these “focus groups”? And, how many parents, students, community members, teachers, and administrators have heard of, let alone been invited to be part of, “focus groups” operating within their local schools? If such “focus groups” are indeed operating within our schools, I would like to inform the school board and Ms. Diaz that they either have failed miserably in communicating this information or done an excellent job of selecting a “few” who are operating in obscurity. Sadly, whatever the case may be, Ms. Diaz and the Board have failed miserably in their ability to “tap into the genius” of the many talented individuals within this community! They have, in essence, “disempowered” those who have a great deal of insight and could be instrumental in bringing forth a plan for positive change in this school district. Sadly, unless we demand more as a community, we will continue to be “led” by a board that operates under a veil of secrecy and “governed” by superintendents who are hired to carry out the Board’s narrow, and some might even say, personal agendas. Besides understanding how to empower others, most good leaders understand this simple adage: “If you do not know where you are going, every road will take you nowhere.” As leaders in the classroom, teachers understand that they must identify the goals for any unit of study and state the objectives and devise the teaching strategies for meeting those goals. We know the road we are asking the students to travel. Should we expect any less from our school board and superintendent? It is time that we demand a publicly-crafted strategic plan for this school district. No longer should we allow the Board or Superintendent to state one or two broad generalities (such as,” improve literacy” or “do God’s work”) as goals for this school district without stating the objectives as to how to achieve those goals. (It would really be a blessing to know what Ms. Diaz’s objectives are for her goal “to do God’s work”.) Such practices simply leave too much room for personal agendas, whether they are that of the Board or a Superintendent, to take priority. And, sadly, we are, yet again, suffering the fallout that results from such poor leadership practices: Students are without textbooks, monies for programs have been frozen and then unfrozen, and board members are fighting amongst themselves over the continued tenure of Ms. Diaz. In essence, administrators, teachers, and students are, once again, being held hostage on a road going nowhere. Our students and community deserve more!As a community, we must demand that the current Board put the wheels in motion to establish a strategic plan for this district in which all interested members of this community are empowered to take part. The talented students, parents, community members, business leaders, teachers, professors, and administrators would have no problem identifying the strengths and areas of weaknesses of our schools. Nor would these groups have difficulty identifying the goals and developing the objectives that would put the District on a road going somewhere. Ms. Diaz has stated that any new CEO or leader meets with resistance and problems during the transitioning process. (KVIA interview) I hope she is considering the possibility that the amount of resistance and the number of problems that new CEO experiences during a transitioning period is directly related to his/her ability to be an effective leader. Ms. Diaz has failed to seek community input on crafting a plan for this school district. She has never communicated a plan, unless it is being communicated to the Board behind closed doors, for this school district. Yet, she has she has communicated the need to bring in “the best” from outside the community to help “lead” our district that leaves many of us asking, “Lead us where?” (What a scary road!!) Ms. Diaz and the current Board’s lack of leadership have failed the community, district employees, and most importantly the children! Until we have a long-term plan in place for this District, we will continue to be bogged down in turmoil. Furthermore, we will have no tool to guide us in the hiring of future superintendents or electing school board members that share our district’s vision, nor we will have no tool for evaluating their work. We need to define our road and choose leaders who know they will be held accountable for empowering and facilitating us in taking that road.

­­--

As a longtime, current employee, I wholeheartedly agree that the morale in this district is, at this time, the worst it's ever been. It is time for the employees and the community to rally together and SAVE OUR SCHOOLS. We have an opportunity to respond to this SOS. Let's show up at the board meeting to SUPPORT OUR SCHOOLS, SUPPORT OUR STAFF, and SERVE OUR STUDENTS. Let's have a series of SOS fund raisers to build morale, show that we're willing to put our money where are mouths are, and SAVE OUR SANITY.

--

I so love a challenge! Therefore, I am looking forward to meeting Sonia, before she rides out of town on her hijacked broom stick. Perhaps we could meet for a soda at the Wal-Mart McDonald's or chat for awhile at Style America, where I get my hair cut. Oops! My bad! Sonia wouldn't be caught dead or alive in these places. Maybe that's one of the problems, then. Welcome to my world, Sonia! Please understand that to become part of this community, I would expect to see you in such places, just like I see many of my students and their parents. But, beware...I will interrupt my conversation with you to acknowledge these very people who have helped me become successful in my teaching. Not to worry though; if you behave, I just might introduce you to some of these wonderful and caring people. Had you given us a chance, you might have learned this for yourself!

--

I'd just like to say that as soon as the new super was named, I began a Google search of her past employment and what I found was not reassuring. If I could do this, surely the board and headhunter company could have done this as well. Blaming the headhunter company, while legitimate, does still not release the board from the fact that they failed to check this person out. Another clue was her statement about "feeling such a spiritual connection to Las Cruces" and her statements about the test results. She expressed such disappointment--it came off as negative and condescending. How about a statement such as: it gives direction, it shows us what needs to be done, it clarifies the direction we need to take. Third clue: her pin-up picture in front of Sonoma Ranch Elementary. It was totally inappropriate, in my opinion for a professional educator. Add to that, the bowing at LCHS when she first met the faculty and staff and introduced herself. And so the clues have gone on and on and we are now at a decision-making point. I truly believe Sonia may be guilty of fiscal mismanagement to the degree of prosecution. I can't believe the board would place her on administrative leave even with the furor she's caused in school and within the community, unless there is more to this story. Remember, it took them a long time to address Louis Martinez's behavior? Regardless of the evidence and reasons for placing her on leave, she simply doesn't "fit" in our community. Her comment about God is a cheap attempt to sway people and she ought to be ashamed. She has cultivated support among the most influential people in our community yet treats her subordinates poorly. She is very crafty and knows exactly what she's doing. This won't change, she needs to go. As to her successor, the board simply can't choose a satisfactory leader. With the exception of Chuck Davis, the board needs to be replaced and a new board installed that will listen to the needs and concerns of the community and to take their recommendations seriously. The fact that this hasn't been done, is the very reason we are at this point. My condolences to the employees, teachers and administrators who must try to meet the needs of our students while riding on this roller coaster. Attend the board meeting, there is power in numbers. The super and board can't possibly discount numbers and discipline everyone in attendance. If we want change, we must act!

--

In regards to the comment about Gutierrez and Marrufo, I guess you can say it helps to have friends in high places. Way to go Sunrise!

--

A contributor (Educational Assistant?) mentioned teachers sent away to trainings after hearing word that Diaz didn't approve of this practice. EAs and Substitutes deserve endless gratitude for helping the schools "run." As an experienced teacher, I have found some of these grade-level days are needed and educationally recharging (it took me a while to learn/contribute rather than blister at the "insult")! It is a problem if EAs are misused and pulled to help these communications happen- but thank you. I like knowing that we have a goal as a district (even if not supported by sup/board).If a teacher can't tell the students the day before he/she is gone what learning/work is expected so that the students are not doing just busy work- you are not partnered well. Some schools are sending teachers out of district at student title I expense- that is what we should be upset about!

--

Meanwhile...back on the farm...the little PLT's throughout the local schools are: performing administrative duties, again, using school hours and resources to work on their college degree programs, and, generally, running amuck. Since Sonia did not like their presence within the schools, perhaps she could open the flood gates at central office and give these eager beavers new jobs, like slopping up some of the mess that's been created! At least they would be productively earning their salaries!

9 Comments:

At 7:50 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whoa! Waaaaaait a minute..... who is this Ms. Cervantes? What exactly is her job description? Why do we have $$$ to hire her and not have $$$ to hire teachers who are sorely needed??? Especially at Camino Real Middle School??? I don't get it.

 
At 8:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

(Broad and soulful) "For what we are about to receive, we are truly grateful... Amen"

 
At 9:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for the gratitude to EA's. Not sure exactly what the post referred to, but as an EA I truly thank you for appreciating us-we work 7 hours, no breaks other than 30 minute lunch, attend all after school functions such as open houses and parent conferences. We do all of this for less that $1000 a month. But, like you, we do all of this willingly because we love our job and we love helping students learn.

 
At 9:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've been keeping up and posting on this blog for the past few weeks, and most of my posts have dealt mainly with Dr. Diaz and the school board. What I haven't been focusing enough on is the great people of the city. This includes the school administrators, teachers, educational assistants, custodians, librarians, cafeteria staff, the police officers who patrol the schools and enforce the school zone speed limits, the crossing guards, support staff, and most importantly, the secretaries. These people make teaching the greatest job on earth, along with the most important people of all, the talented students of Las Cruces. These are the people we should be focusing on, not the morons at central office "running things" (and yes, most of them are in fact morons, look it up, their picture is right there in the dictionary next to the word!).

 
At 11:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As a high school teacher in LCPS I have a question. Are we not allowed to discuss the specifics of why our school was deemed "failing"? This term is very misleading. Instead of just labeling the high schools as "failing" are we not allowed to say the specific area(s) we are not meeting AYP in? My understanding is that for one high school, if one additional special education student had taken the test the school would not be failing, also, that the scores of the students who are new to the United States are too low.(Maybe because they don't speak OR READ English yet?) I've lived on the border all my life and can barely speak Spanish so why do we hold such a hard line on how fast these students must be proficient in English? Why are we not crowing about how many National Merit Scholars Las Cruces Public Schools has produced? My understanding is that Las Cruces (the high schools together) has 10 National Merit Scholars (juniors scoring in the top 2% on the PSAT) and at least 10 Hispanic Scholars. Let's build on what we are doing right and work together to identify what could be done better. I'm tired of feeling like everyone thinks we (teachers) are worthless and don't care about the students. We love and are proud of our kids, and truly want the best for them.

 
At 11:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

When Dr. Diaz visited our school, she had a security guard "guard" her car while the rest of the security guards were forced to escort her to and from the library (where she was introduced to the staff). Did she honestly feel in danger? Does she have such a low opinion of our children? I realize she came from larger, maybe tougher school districts before, but shouldn't she have known something about us before she came? I feel like she was completely taken by surprise as far as the culture of southern New Mexico. Her "transition team" would have served her better had they done some research on the school district and local culture. She might not have made such arrogant and insensitive statements if she had understood where she was coming before she opened her mouth. We may be casual and somewhat laid back, but we are not stupid as she seems to believe. She seems to have mistaken the friendliness and good manners as an indication of simple ignorant people easily manipulated. Big mistake.

 
At 6:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perhaps someone could explain to me why central office administrators need to be gone for several days for such trainings as the Dsylexia Conference - now, these are administrators who have not taught a lesson in the classroom in at least 10 years, and have no dealings with real students. Do they just look for opportunities to get out of central office and take a trip? I think the money could better be spent on the actual students or the teachers who teach them.

 
At 8:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This blog is just turning into a place to destroy anyone you have a problem with. It has been a place to get information, but now it is about hair salons, attacking each other and insults with no accountability. It is time to either bringsome class back to the blog or shut it down. We should be ashamed. I am going to try to avoid this blog from now on.

 
At 9:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can't believe what the person who wrote about their PLT-you mean PDT I believe. We really value our PDT. She works hard at helping us out and making our work easier. How sad for you and your school. How sad for your PDT to have to work with such a vile person as yourself. I am imagining a lonely woman with 20 cats that authored that.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home