LCPS Underground

Las Cruces Public Schools postings concerning the current administration and issues in the district. Every effort has been made to deal in fact, not fiction. If you want to make a comment, click on comments after any post and write your comment. These may be sent anonymously. Email should be sent to lcps_truth@yahoo.com. All email will be confidential.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Tuesday Evening 11-14

Blogger Comment: 3 board members were present and voted today at the 1:00 meeting. 2 voted to keep Diaz on Administrative Leave. One voted to bring her back. Guess who voted to bring her back? Leonel Briseno
Further proof that Briseno does not care about what the investigation may reveal nor does he care about employees who have endured abuse at the hands of this woman.
--

Thank you channel 7 for exposing this bold faced lie. LCPS Board- wake up and act. this cannot continue.
--

A bold faced lie!!! If you did not catch the implications of the Channel 7 breaking news, Dr. Diaz has just lied on public TV concerning the job posting for the Business manager position filled by John Marsillo. The job was never posted as stated(verified) by Jo Galvan, but Dr. Diaz stated, "I did in fact talk to several of my colleagues nationwide including Dr. Martin at NMSU and we did post the position. We were not satisfied with the number of applicants or the quality of applicants." What a bold faced lie. If this is not cause for dismissal (lying on public news cast) what is? !!! We cannot allow the credibility of this school district to be placed in further jeopardy. The Board needs to act decisively and quickly.
--

I also posted this at Heath Haussamen's blog after he gave his somewhat uninformed opinion that our schools need to change on his site:"Change" is a word that is too broad for this situation. What our school system needs to do is keep all that is good about it, while incorporating new challenges and standards. That means inspiring, empowering, and engaging families and teaching professionals. Fear has no place in this work. We are all looking for a leader, someone who has a love for our kids, our town and our southwestern way of life at heart, and who treats people with the respect and positive encouragement we need to take on these big "changes". Also, this community has a unique culture, and one of its best attributes is its warmth and small-town feel. We know one another, and we also know that if we say or do something in one context, there those same people will be again later in another context, and so we tend to treat each other a little more gently here when we need to confront.

All of the above means that Sonya Diaz at the very least is a poor fit as the highest leader for our school system (which, quite frankly doesn't do as bad a job as many claim!). She came here as if she was running a major corporation, and decided to use impersonal and abusive Machiavellian tactics first, apologize later. She has a basic approach to the world in which she has little respect for those for whom she has no personal or political use.

She should have learned a little Anthropology at Harvard, and come into our community with the idea she is a GUEST and OBSERVER first, not a "Conquistadora". If you have any respect or knowledge of the history of New Mexico, many people here have a more recent memory of that kind of interaction, and tend to buck any semblance of status-based oppression. (And I say that as an Anglo, an adopted New Mexican of 20 years who feels more kinship and love for/from my "Hispanic" friends and neighbors than I ever did for those in my Volvo driving white ethnic group back East.) We need to get rid of her, and bring in someone who can speak our REAL language here in Las Cruces.
--

Although it is painfully obvious that Dr. Diaz was the wrong choice for this district and that some heavy consequences hang in the balance, one thing is painfully clear: the source of the problem is the board. Unfortunately, we are stuck with two board members for several more years. One board member of the three not up for election is trying to work with and for the employees of the district. Briseno and Wooden are antagonistic to employees, in general, and must be replaced. They are poison. For that reason, I believe we need a recall or for the state to take over the district and replace the board. Just as an aside, one of the most surprising things to emerge from this discussion is the fact that Briseno supporters can actually use the computer!
--

5 Comments:

At 7:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Absolutely gutless, with not a shred of integrity. The board has now made a very public demonstration of its total incompetence and complete lack of courage. Hand they any honor, the members wopuld "fall on their sword" and resign. They might then save a shred of dignity.

 
At 8:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I couldn't believe my ears! Mr. Briseno is not even willing to hear what employees have to say before deciding to return the Superintendent?! I can't understand how a School Board member would not want a thorough investigation of how she treats people. By wanting her back before they investigate is the same as telling this community that it's okay to treat employees poorly, it's okay to maintain chaos in our school system, and it's okay to ignore the pleas of those who work with our students. Mr. Briseno, shame on you!

 
At 8:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

We are not stuck with three of the board members. If the State comes in and removes the present board, then all seats are open. There is hope and a light at the end of the tunnel.
Come on PED!

 
At 9:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have heard many people guessing at Dr. Diaz' psychaitric diagonisis. Well, there is not doubt in my mind about it - she has a Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

The American Psychiatric Association (DSM-IV) lists the following criteria for the disorder.
At least five (5) of the following indicators:
1. A grandiose sense of self-importance.
2. Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimted success, power, brillance, beauty, or ideal love.
3. Believes that she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or associate with, other special people.
4. Requires excessive admiration.
5. Has a sense of entitlement.
6. Is interpersonally exploitive.
7. Lack empathy.
8. Is envious of others or beleives that others are envious of her
9. Shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes.

It is clear to me that Dr. Diaz has met all of the nine criteria, not just five! To make matters worse, people with this disorder usually do not recognize it, typically do not seek treatment, and even if such a person does seek treatment, it is unlikely to produce any improvement.

Do we want the LCPS to go down the tubes at the hands of a mentally ill leader! I hope not!

 
At 9:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Sun News is conducting a poll on their website - vote for Dr. Diaz or "her detractors."
Here is the website - http://www.lcsun-news.com/

 

Post a Comment

<< Home